Home → Gem issues →

Subject: relevance-rcov not building

Original Post

aaron

13 Sep, 2009 09:14 PM

Admin Functions

• Edit
• Remove/Spam

I have tried to push relevance-rcov a couple of times since friday but I haven't received any build notifications. Version 0.9.0 still seems to be what's available. Version 0.9.1.1 should be what shows up.

1. Support Staff 2 Posted by Tekkub on 14 Sep, 2009 01:33 AM

   

   Forcing a rebuild resulted in:

   The gem build failed with the following error: No such file or directory - bin/rcov
   

   I think something is up with the gem builder, I've seen similar errors from other gems recently. We're looking into it.

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

2. 3 Posted by aaron on 14 Sep, 2009 11:49 AM

   

   Yes, something does seem a little off. I can build the gem locally without any issues. Were you able to find anything wrong?

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

3. 4 Posted by Jay on 14 Sep, 2009 01:13 PM

   

   Hey Aaron,

   I tried to get my Fork of your rcov to generate gems and I'm getting the java version to build but not the mri version. fwiw.

   Jay

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

4. 5 Posted by aaron on 14 Sep, 2009 01:30 PM

   

   Jay,

   I noticed that when I looked through other gem builder issues. I am going to wait to see what GH reports back on this issue then take a look at what's left.

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

5. 6 Posted by aaron on 16 Sep, 2009 12:45 AM

   

   any progress on this? RCov still has not built

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

6. Support Staff 7 Posted by Tekkub on 16 Sep, 2009 08:53 AM

   

   I got the gem to build, but I think that only one platform will build based on how we currently check for an existing version of the gem. I have an idea of how to get this fixed though, One question for you though, if you specify a platform in one gem (java), don't you have to specify a platform in the other as well? Otherwise wouldn't it take the platform-less gem to be a universal and prefer it? Gem's documentation regarding platforms leaves a lot to be desired...

   For example, hooligan495-rcov:

   $ gem list -r -d -a hooligan495-rcov
   
   *** REMOTE GEMS ***
   
   hooligan495-rcov (0.9.1, 0.8.1.3.0)
       Platforms:
           0.8.1.3.0: ruby
           0.9.1: java
       Authors: Relevance, Chad Humphries (spicycode), Aaron Bedra
       (abedra), Jay McGaffigan, Mauricio Fernandez
       Homepage: http://github.com/relevance/rcov
   
       Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby
   

   Over on the server I see two version of 0.8.1.3.0, java and no-platform. But if I look at a gem that I know is platform specific on rubyforge...

   $ gem list -r -d -a json
   
   *** REMOTE GEMS ***
   
   json (1.1.9, 1.1.8, 1.1.7, 1.1.6, 1.1.5, 1.1.4, 1.1.3, 1.1.2, 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2, 1.0.1, 1.0.0, 0.4.3, 0.4.2, 0.4.1, 0.4.0)
       Platforms:
           0.4.0: ruby
           0.4.1: ruby
           0.4.2: ruby
           0.4.3: ruby
           1.0.0: ruby
           1.0.1: ruby
           1.0.2: ruby
           1.0.3: mswin32, ruby
           1.0.4: mswin32, ruby
           1.1.0: mswin32, ruby
           1.1.1: mswin32, ruby
           1.1.2: ruby
           1.1.3: ruby
           1.1.4: ruby
           1.1.5: ruby, x86-linux, x86-mswin32
           1.1.6: ruby, x86-mswin32
           1.1.7: ruby, x86-mswin32
           1.1.8: ruby, x86-mswin32
           1.1.9: ruby, x86-mswin32
       Author: Florian Frank
       Rubyforge: http://rubyforge.org/projects/json
       Homepage: http://json.rubyforge.org
   
       A JSON implementation as a Ruby extension
   

   LIke I said, gem's docs are kinda lacking, am I missing something here that would make it easier for us to detect gem version AND platform before we build to make sure we don't have a conflict?

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Remove/Spam

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.